

Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreements? Think Before You Act. by Michael R. McCurdy
During the past 20 years, dissatisfaction with traditional courtroom litigation caused many
businesses to include binding arbitration provisions in their contracts. Recently, however, many
businesses have become dissatisfied with the arbitration process, and many attempt to avoid
arbitration as a dispute resolution procedure when possible. Indeed, businesses are turning to the
courts for declarations that their disputes are not subject to binding arbitration.
In considering whether to include a binding arbitration provision in your contract, you should
consider the pros and cons of resolving commercial disputes through arbitration as opposed to
traditional litigation. Generally, the benefits of one are not afforded by the other, and which is best
for your business depends on the nature of your commercial transactions.
In contrast to traditional litigation, binding arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution
procedure offers:
- Privacy - arbitration proceedings are generally conducted "behind closed doors,"
without the need to create a public file or record;
- Informality - most discovery and rules of evidence are inapplicable in arbitration
proceedings, unless the arbitration agreement specifically requires their application;
- Expediency - the informality of arbitration and the elimination of most or all
discovery allow for disputes to be resolved more quickly in arbitration as opposed to traditional
litigation;
- Cost savings - because of the informality and expediency, most arbitrations are
concluded much more quickly, and therefore much less expensively, than traditional litigation;
- Specialization - arbitration may allow the parties to choose an arbitrator experienced
or trained in the subject of the dispute;
- Unpredictability - because arbitrators generally are not required to follow legal
precedent or procedural or evidentiary rules, and because many arbitrators are not licensed attorneys,
the outcome of arbitration may be much less predictable than the outcome of traditional litigation;
- Finality - most arbitration decisions cannot be reviewed on appeal; thus the
arbitrator's decision is final;
- Preservation of business relationships - arbitrating disputes may allow them to be
resolved without the antagonism that can develop in traditional litigation, thus allowing a
continuation of a profitable on-going business relationship.
If your business prefers resolving its disputes through binding arbitration, issues to consider
when including an arbitration provision in your contracts include:
- Whether all disputes arising out of the contract are to be submitted to binding
arbitration. If not, the arbitration provision should specifically state which disputes are excluded
from the scope of the agreement;
- What substantive and procedural laws should govern the arbitration, if any. If the
contract is silent on this issue, the resolution of your dispute is more likely to be governed by
equitable considerations [in other words, the arbitrator may reach an outcome that he believes is fair
under the circumstances, rather than an outcome required by law or the terms of the contract];
- Where the arbitration hearing will be held, the procedure and time within which to
initiate arbitration, the procedure for selecting an arbitrator, and the procedure that will govern the
arbitration;
- Whether damages to be awarded are limited by type or amount.
If your agreement fails to address these essential points, you may spend as much time arguing in the
arbitration proceeding over whether the particular dispute is subject to arbitration, and the rules
governing that proceeding, as you will spend in actually resolving your dispute.
Binding arbitration provisions in commercial contracts offer both advantages and
disadvantages. While often allowing for relatively quick and less expensive adjudication of disputes
when compared to traditional litigation, arbitration may not allow for a thorough investigation of the
facts underlying the dispute or the opportunity to appeal an unfavorable decision.

This Article is published for general
information,
not to provide specific legal advice. The application of any matter discussed in this article to
anyone's particular situation requires knowledge and analysis of the specific facts
involved.
Copyright © 2001, Fairfield and Woods, P.C., ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
Comments or inquiries may be directed to: Michael R. McCurdy or John M. Tanner.
|