

Interviewing Guidelines By Brent T. Johnson

This article provides a brief introduction to legal issues involved in interviewing job applicants
for available positions. It focuses primarily on questions that should not be asked by an
employer during an interview, under federal and Colorado law.
Federal and Colorado statutes prohibit employment discrimination based on race,
color, religion, sex, national origin, age, and physical or mental disability. A Denver
ordinance adds marital status and sexual orientation to the list of protected classes. Employers
should take care not to run afoul of these laws when interviewing job applicants. During
interviewing, no questions should be asked which directly seek information about the
applicant's inclusion in any of the protected classes listed above. Questions which indirectly
might elicit such information should also be avoided. For example, questions about where an
applicant's parents come from may seek information about national origin, questions about the
applicant's date of graduation may seek information about age, and questions about which
organizations an applicant belongs to may seek information about religion, race, or national
origin.
There are also some specific questions which should not be asked that may not be
intuitive. For example, an employer may ask whether an applicant has been convicted of a
crime, but not whether the applicant has ever been arrested. (Because some minority groups
have higher arrest rates, either criteria could screen out a higher percentage of minority
applicants and thereby have an "adverse impact" on minority groups. Business necessity may
justify that adverse impact with respect to convictions, but the EEOC maintains that mere
arrests do not necessarily indicate wrongdoing and therefore there cannot be a business
necessity for obtaining this information.) You also should not ask whether an applicant has
ever filed bankruptcy, whether the applicant is a U.S. citizen (you may ask whether the
applicant is legally eligible for employment in the U.S.), or whether the applicant has ever
filed any worker's comp claims. Applicants should not be asked questions about day care
arrangements for children or which spouse stays home with a sick child. Such questions are
discriminatory if asked only of female applicants, and even if the questions were in fact asked
of all applicants, some might assume they are asked only of females, or otherwise be offended
by the questions. In general, an interviewer should avoid asking any questions only of one
gender of applicants, such as, "Do you have any future plans to raise a family and perhaps
withdraw from full-time employment?"
The statutory prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of physical or mental
disability perhaps pose the greatest minefield for interviewers. A person has a "disability"
if:
1. the person has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one
or more
major life activities;
2. the person has a history of such an impairment; or
3. the person is (erroneously) regarded as having such an
impairment.
An employer may not discriminate against a qualified person with a disability who is able to
perform the "essential functions" of the position, either with or without "reasonable
accommodation." Unlike other anti-discrimination statutes, where asking a "wrong question"
only gives rise to an inference that the employer intends to use the answer in a discriminatory
manner, the Americans with Disabilities Act provides that it is per se unlawful to make
inquiries of an applicant as to whether the applicant has a disability or as to the nature or
severity of such a disability. It is acceptable to ask about the applicant's ability to perform
job-related functions. Here are some examples of questions that should not be asked:
Do you have asthma (or AIDS)?
Do you have a disability that would interfere with your ability to perform the
job? (Acceptable to ask whether an applicant can perform a certain job function, such
as using a computer, with or without accommodation.)
How many days were you sick last year? (Acceptable to describe employer's
attendance policy and ask whether the applicant believes he/she can meet those
requirements.)
How much alcohol do you drink each week? Have you ever been treated for
alcoholism? (Alcoholism, past or present, and past drug addiction can be a protected
disability, unlike current use of unlawful drugs, which is not protected.) It
is acceptable to ask whether the applicant drinks alcohol.
Have you ever been treated for mental health problems?
Asking an obviously disabled applicant questions about how the disability
happened, what the prognosis is, or how the impairment affects the applicant's daily
life activities.
Asking follow up questions concerning a disability that is voluntarily disclosed
by an applicant. [But see update, below]
Can you stand? Can you walk? (These questions are probably too broad to be
directed to ability to perform a job function, and instead are regarded as inquiries into
the existence of a disability.)
Would you need accommodation to perform this job (or this specific job
function)? (Acceptable to ask whether the applicant can perform a job function with or
without reasonable accommodation, or to ask the applicant to describe how he/she
would perform the job function with or without reasonable accommodation.)
[But see update, below]
What medications are you currently taking?
The EEOC's guidelines on preemployment inquiries cover the above specific points
and state the obvious: "there are sometimes subtle distinctions between a permissible and a
prohibited pre-offer inquiry." Employers should exercise great caution in asking questions
that may implicate the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Update: In response to comments from employers and advocates for the
disabled to the effect that the guidelines did not allow employers to explore in appropriate
cases whether they could accommodate an applicant, the EEOC in late 1995 revised its
guidelines to provide that there are three situations in which an employer may ask questions
about reasonable accommodations that an applicant with a disability would need on the
job:
1. If an applicant has an obvious disability that would require
accommodations;
2. If the applicant voluntarily discloses a hidden disability; or
3. If the applicant asks for some type of reasonable accommodation.

This Article is published for general
information,
not to provide specific legal advice. The application of any matter discussed in this article to
anyone's particular situation requires knowledge and analysis of the specific facts
involved.
Copyright © 1995, Fairfield and Woods, P.C., ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED.
Comments or inquiries may be directed to: Brent T. Johnson.
|